Here are two things I’ve worked on this weekend – first, an excerpt from the weekly newsletter that summarizes the HOMA item on the Planning Commission agenda on Wednesday night. This is only part of the newsletter, which this week also covered the Human Services Commission agenda, Council’s consent calendar, the Hazard Mitigation Plan, FIFA World Cup plans, mandatory minimum, NAP for Eastgate and Factoria, Affordable Housing Strategy, Curb Pricing, and the Transportation Facility Plan Update. Please sign up for the newsletter using the link in the upper right if this sort of thing interests you.
Second, a letter to the Planning Commission. I probably should have titled it Medium to Large scale HOMA opportunities, since there are also a lot of even smaller parcels that will likely be affected and will need a different approach. I will try to add references here, such as the link to childcare recommendations, in advance of the meeting on Wednesday. I should also caveat that I haven’t talked to anyone about most of these ideas, such as curb-sharing, microvotes, or commercial space occupancy requirements. I also see value in copying other jurisdictions and past projects, so that we can have more confidence that an experiment will work, and I have more legwork here before I expect anyone to be convinced, this is just my vision.
Newsletter Excerpt
Housing Opportunities in Mixed Use Areas: Bellevue has adopted a target to create 5,700 affordable housing units between 2026-2036. The agenda memo has a rundown of the past Council and Planning Commission discussions that have led to this point, and also points to the economic analysis which was done. Lowrise development was the only housing type that would have favorable market conditions that allow feasibility. Positive conditions for lowrise development can almost entirely be attributed to its utilization of surface parking rather than structured parking. One change in the proposed rules is an alteration in lot coverage that would disincentivize surface parking but still allow density. It is interesting to see in the analysis how parking spot construction costs increase with depth. In a prototypical 250 unit building, the Middle Housing changes reduced the parking requirement from 338 to 250 spaces, and a further decrease will come soon with ESSB 5184 implementation.
(more…)